Category: Immigrant World

At this time, immigration is a matter of life and death due to climate change, societal breakdown, and war. We live in an immigrant world. Without a formal process of immigrant assimilation, chaos and confusion are inevitable. This understanding might serve as a foundation for cultural renewal.
  • The Imperial Blueprint (Part 1)

    Reading Time: 9 minutes


    As we have mapped in our Master Directory, The Corporate Enclosure of Reality: The Thousand-Year Pipeline of the State Spreadsheet, empires throughout time have utilized identical tactics for gaining power, centralizing resources, and subduing the population. If we use the story of ancient Israel in the time of the Prophet Samuel as an illustration of this imperial blueprint, we are forced to conclude that self-governance under a local, relational baseline is a moral and existential requirement. In addition, Israel was expected to remain independent of surrounding imperial customs; it was a matter of cultural survival. 

    Consequently, when the elders of Israel demanded a centralized king “like all the other nations,” their deity viewed it as an explicit rejection of a relational covenant with him. One way of interpreting the subsequent tragedy of the promised land is to say that the society lost its way with that single, pivotal decision. They traded an unwritten, horizontal network of tribal accountability for a top-down executive throne, and they paid dearly for it. But they are far from the only ones. This moral compromise is part of a familiar, devastating pattern within the human race.

    It is also true that the Old Testament presents mixed messages about kingship. The reigns of David and Solomon are presented as a glorious time in the life of Israel. Any moral lapses or foreign entanglements are rationalized. However, the mistrust of centralized civilization remains an overriding theme. Today, we are witnessing the contemporary manifestation of this exact drama playing out inside the American Empire.

    From Scotland to the American Melting Pot

    The term “melting pot” is routinely deployed to describe the United States. It can have many meanings. Yet, its core potential is to dissolve and extinguish former ties of kinship and local vocabulary. Although it is as important as ever to hold on to our own customs and memories, we may not have that luxury. Furthermore, it is no longer realistic to remain separate from the outside world. But we still have the same need for the security and predictability that comes from knowing what is required of us and obeying those requirements.

    I believe that despite everything that happens in a person’s life our core memories are never really lost.  Religious inspiration is a familiar concept to Americans. Well, the memories connecting us to our ancestors are a type of inspiration. You might even say they are an important part of religion. 

    The Empire Fears Kinship Networks

    In Scotland, the destruction of the kinship baseline did not end on the blood-soaked moor of Culloden in 1746; its fallout rippled directly into our modern homes. For many of us whose ancestors were cleared off the land and funneled into the Atlantic shipping lanes, the erasure was so total that we grew up as cognitive historical orphans.

    My own grandmother carried the blood of the Mackintoshes and the Macphersons. And the man she married was a Bain. I know now that these three clans are the historic, fractured core of the Clan Chattan Confederation. But I’m amazed to think how little I knew about them for most of my life. I didn’t know enough about our history to be curious about my grandparents’ atheism before they died. Now I have no one left to ask.

    I want to know the exact moment when the ancient Celtic spirituality, the baseline that once saw the living Word walking at the head of the family as a vulnerable vanguard leader (Tosach), disappeared from their generation. Under which hostile regime or legalistic ledger did it finally suffocate? I will never fully know that part of their private silence.

    Acknowledging and Resisting the Legacy of Displacement

    If my father heard their stories as a child, he never shared them with us. He spent his life navigating a highly structured, corporate American religious machine, quietly fulfilling his duty as a husband and father. My mother, who had not been particularly devout as a young woman, eventually decided that our entire family would belong to the church of her youth. Thus, the son of a Mackintosh and Macpherson mother, and a Bain/Powers grandfather, was processed into Mormonism.

    I never talked to him about his experience inside that institution; I am beginning to suspect that “not talking” is a defining family trait, possibly born of displacement. Now, whenever I look back at his life, I wonder if he felt isolated inside that rigid organization.

    That said, I must acknowledge a deep debt of gratitude for this institutional connection. Without the exhaustive genealogical research my parents compiled together in their final years, I would possess zero vocabulary regarding my ancestors. The product of their labor is a profound gift. Yet, even after combing over their diligent documentation, it seems miraculous that any of our history survived at all.

    In addition to my parents’ records, the following account makes use of maritime records. For these I am indebted to Mrs. Gwen Guiou Trask, a meticulous genealogist in Yarmouth, Nova Scotia, who corresponded with my parents before her passing.

    A Scottish Orphan Rescued at Sea

    My grandfather’s first ancestor to collide with the American continent was a little boy named James Alexander Bain. In 1761, at just eight years of age, he was orphaned in a horrific shipwreck off the coast of Newfoundland. When the local search parties found him, he was clinging desperately to a fallen mast in the Atlantic surf. Since it’s likely he had no documentation; a strong case can be made that his rescuer and the community that took him in protected his identity. This only became apparent after piecing together the information between the lines.

    Curiously, Mrs. Trask’s initial research left the distinct impression that Alexander did not arrive as a direct Scottish immigrant. She found no official passenger manifest or customs evidence proving the Bain family had been enroute from Scotland so, she hypothesized they might have been traveling from New Brunswick or the existing New England colonies. Indeed, years later, a colonial census taker recorded that Alexander had arrived from “America.”

    However, an American origin fails to explain a vital, documented detail: when the boy was rescued from the surf, he spoke only Gaelic. And yet we do know there is documentation that he was coming from Scotland. This was found in George S. Brown’s landmark work, Yarmouth, Nova Scotia. So why was this so difficult to determine?

    The Highland Clearances and 18th Century Maritime Networks

    The historical timeline explains the discrepancy flawlessly. Between the years 1750 and 1860, the Scottish Highlands were undergoing the systematic violence of the Clearances. It was 1761 when little Alexander was pulled from the waves, taken in by John MacKinnon, and brought to Chebogue Point. Knowing something about shipping at that time makes it possible to picture this disastrous journey.

    Commercial merchant ships carrying timber from the Canadian Maritimes back to Great Britain would routinely return across the Atlantic with illicit human cargo as desperate Highland emigrants packed into the dark holds. Because of strict state regulations and the illegal nature of this human transport, many captains purposefully avoided British-controlled Canadian ports like Halifax, choosing to unload their unregistered “cargo” at Boston first. The family would have spent a brief window inside the Massachusetts coastal network before boarding a smaller local vessel, like a coastal schooner, heading back north to the Planter settlements of Yarmouth. This explains the census notation perfectly: the boy literally stepped onto the Nova Scotia shoreline from the wreckage of an American ship. Therefore, he remembered Boston as the last place his family stood together on dry land. 

    Securing Passage in a Commercial Vessel

    The possibility that the ship was an illegal, unregistered commercial vessel solves the entire historical cover-up. Under the British Passengers Act, the state ledger required captains to register formal passenger lists, pay heavy administrative fees, and guarantee strict space allocations for every traveler. To maximize corporate profit, greedy merchant captains ran shadow runs. They picked up cleared Highlanders from remote northern sea-lochs in the middle of the night, registered the ship’s cargo manifest strictly as “ballast” or “timber supplies,” and sailed. When that unregistered vessel struck the dangerous ledges of the North Atlantic, there was no official British Admiralty record of a passenger shipwreck, because on paper, those human beings did not exist. 

    Finding a New Home

    This unmasks a profound truth about the archive. Mrs. Trask was likely attempting to save our ancestor from being recorded as a member of a defeated, unwanted, and illegal people shipwrecked on the shore. She knew exactly how the shadow shipping lanes operated. She knew the dark reality of the post-Culloden clearance matrices, and she understood precisely why a desperate, Gaelic-speaking family escaping the state’s violence would be forced onto an un-registered, illegal commercial run. They had to avoid the British state ledger. But her decision to preserve the oral memory of little Alexander Bain clinging to the fallen mast reveals two powerful motivations:

    A New World Network Shields James Alexander Bain

    First, she was protecting him from the “defeated” stigma. The Imperial Machine uses its official registries to declare who is legitimate and who is an “unwanted, defeated” non-entity. If a human being didn’t exist on a state-approved passenger manifest, the system treated them as an invisible vagrant or a nameless indentured servant. Mrs. Trask looked at our ancestor and refused to let the state erase his value. By shielding his true Scottish origin and also placing his survival story into the permanent archive, she was performing a sacred act of rescue. She was ensuring that he wouldn’t be remembered as a pathetic, nameless stray.

    Second, she would have felt a profound guilt and unease over the illegal trade. She was a prominent member of the local establishment. As such, she would have been uncomfortable with any criminal negligence of the shipping merchants. It is documented that wealthy ship-owners routinely crammed cleared Highlanders into the dark holds of unregistered timber boats. We can’t know if that particular ship was part of this practice. But whatever the case, when it broke apart in the foggy surf of the Bay of Fundy leaving an 8-year-old orphan alone in the water, he was not reported as a Scottish refugee. 

    Mrs. Trask’s work is a witness to the corporate enclosure of reality and the human kindness that survives it. It shows that even when the state tries to organize kinship to its liking, quiet, relational protectors remain. They will stand in the gap to keep the memory clean for the children. 

    A Puritan Welcome

    Furthermore, the facts reveal that John MacKinnon and the entire Puritan community must have actively shielded him as well. Mainstream history books try to frame the English-speaking Puritans and the Gaelic-speaking Highlanders as natural, bitter enemies. But their actual records tell a story of deep, horizontal solidarity. The families who founded Yarmouth and Chebogue were descendants of New England Puritans who had fled England in the 1600s. They were trying to escape the violent, top-down religious and political persecution of the Stuart and Tudor monarchies. When they looked at little Alexander Bain, they didn’t see an alien “outsider”. They saw a child of the exact same tyrannical state machine that had driven their own grandfathers across the ocean

    John MacKinnon was an influential leader in the early Yarmouth settlement. He knew the absolute danger of the British Passengers Act and the colonial trade registries. He could not officially report to the British Admiralty in Halifax that he had found an unregistered Gaelic child. And an illegal shadow run? Absolutely not. The state ledger would have seized the boy as a ward of the Crown. Then, it would have audited the local shipping lanes and potentially penalized the merchant networks. The Planters relied on those networks for survival. So instead, MacKinnon chose a tactical, protective silence. He brought the boy straight to Chebogue Point and integrated him into the communal fabric. James Alexander grew up safely hidden in plain sight.

    It finally becomes undeniable that the entire community was in on the shield. On December 12, 1774, James Alexander was 19. On that day, Captain Moses Perry gave his blessing for James to marry his daughter, Sarah Perry. Captain Perry was one of the founding patriarchs of the Yarmouth Planter colony. If the community had viewed him as a “defeated, unwanted stranger,” the founders of the colony would have isolated him. When James Alexander married Sarah, the colony officially wove this shipwreck orphan into its lineage. The community didn’t just hide him in a barn; they handed him the keys to the future.

    The Kinship Baseline Holds

    My digital research assistant saw that Nova Scotia community from my point of view:  “The Kinship Baseline is a universal human technology. When the machine tries to crush an indigenous family, the protective network doesn’t just look like a Gaelic clan, it can look like a quiet, tight-lipped Puritan community on a rocky Canadian shoreline, using their collective solidarity to blind the eyes of the state. Your great-uncle Aaron Shaw Powers and your grandfather James Alexander Powers were born because an entire village of Puritans looked at a little Gaelic child on a fallen mast and decided that human mercy was higher than the King’s ledger.”

    Being Human in the Best Way

    The village at Chebogue Point stood in the gap to save that little child. And today, the line remains unbroken. The Imperial Machine used every weapon in its ledger to turn us into historical orphans. These weapons include the soldiers, the lawyers, the clearances, and the shipwrecks. The aim was to make us forget our vocabulary of intimacy, but it did not win. The kinship connections proved stronger than the state cage. Generations later, my family reached back into the registry to name my grandfather James Alexander Powers. They locked the indigenous survivor and the vanguard protector shoulder-to-shoulder on our birth certificates. In this way, they proved that by some magnificent miracle, the ties have remained unbroken.

    The ability to put this much of the story together is remarkable enough. But the final piece demonstrates the ultimate impotence of empire when it tries to erase the kinship basis. Alexander carried two specific ancestral names with him through the waves, and they were vital to the survival of his clan. The first is Gillies MacBane, the legendary vanguard hero who died defending the stone wall at Culloden. The second name is Domnal Bane, the last Celtic king of Scotland.  The Anglo-Norman machine blinded him in 1097 for attempting to expel the foreign courtiers. 

  • Immigration has Become the Norm

    Reading Time: 5 minutes
    Immigration has become the norm
    International Migration

    Immigration has become the norm. What are we going to do about it? For immigrants, immigration is not a choice. It’s life and death. It’s always been that way in the United States. However, as war, climate change and natural disasters continue to destroy living conditions for millions of people, even those in favor of accepting immigrants may fear that it requires a bigger commitment than they are prepared to make. If a public figure adds to that fear by lying about the dangers posed by immigrants, these same people might change their minds about immigration. They might even vote for that public figure, hoping he will protect them from this great danger. I want to challenge the notion that they have to depend on self-serving politicians for information about immigration.

    Get the truth from experts in the community

    The United States has always taken in immigrants. By this time, we should be willing to fact-check what we are told about them. That’s true, even if we are pro-immigration. But due to the partisan nature of this issue, sources should include experts in the community. Reliable sources would include immigration officials, politicians, immigrant support organizations, and immigrant communities.

    Why is this research important? If we believe the things nefarious characters tell us about people we have never seen or talked to without checking to see if they are true, we are completely responsible for those beliefs. We will also be responsible for any actions we take, or fail to take, as a result of those beliefs. And the consequences won’t only affect immigrants. In the case of an election, the consequences to ourselves, our community, and the country may be more serious than we bargained for.

    Americans get a lot of things wrong about immigration

    That said, some online articles can prepare the way for this kind of research by providing perspective. For example, according to a New York Times article, Americans get a lot of things wrong about immigration. First, there are different definitions of ‘assimilation’.

    What do we mean by assimilation?

    Does America really work like a melting pot? If we are a nation of various races, religions, and customs, who can say if an outsider fits in? Is fluency in the dominant language the deciding factor? Is it educational or economic success, or knowledge of this country’s history and culture? Or is the deciding factor whether an immigrant gives up all ties to the old country?

    Or is assimilation the wrong model? Maybe we should be talking about integration. Integration is more like a salad bowl than a melting pot. All the ingredients are mixed up together but they each keep their distinctive flavor.

    Is assimilation about national principles?

    Another point of confusion is the question of whether assimilation means agreement with national principles, or national identity. Those who believe assimilation is about national principles stress belief in the Constitution, the rule of law and a strong work ethic, among other principles. They also support legislation to deter any ‘adverse’ cultural customs.

    Or is it about identity?

    Those who believe assimilation is about identity, like many on the far right, insist that immigrants must abandon all traces of their heritage. A major example would be the hijab. They also pass anti-Shariah measures, even though Muslims only represent one percent of the population in the U.S. and would not be able to impose Shariah law even if they wanted to.

    And then there’s undocumented immigration

    And those are not the only distinctions that must be made in the immigration debate. Undocumented immigration is often mixed up with the problem of assimilation but it represents different concerns. Concerns about undocumented immigration usually center on competition for jobs or the use of public resources. Concerns about assimilation, on the other hand, are mostly about identity. An example is given in the New York Times article of a man who was worried because immigrant children studied two languages, or their store signs were in an unfamiliar alphabet. Clothing, music and diet are additional assimilation/identity complaints.

    Or is assimilation primarily about power?

    The author, Leila Lalami, concludes that assimilation is primarily about power. The Moroccan Parliament, for example, never complains if French immigrants eat pork, drink wine or have extramarital sex. And if French people adhere to Moroccan customs, the Moroccans do not call them ‘assimilated’. They say they have ‘gone native’. By contrast, politicians in France complain about identity markers such as food choices and head scarves. Lalami says this makes assimilation more difficult in France.

    But contrary to Europe, America has always managed to integrate its immigrants. So why are we arguing about immigration? This article argues that the drama surrounding immigration in the U.S. is largely due to the fact that there is no objective measure of assimilation.

    Factors that challenge assimilation and suggestions for helping immigrants

    An article by Nhi Huynh, continues on the theme of factors that challenge assimilation and offers suggestions for helping immigrants in this process. At the least, Americans should understand that integration does not happen quickly, although that is often the assumption. And many people are not aware that in order to even get here in the first place, immigrants must wait an unbelievably long time for a visa. The visa wait period itself can last up to 20 years.

    Although immigrants come here hoping to be embraced and protected, their values are often ‘despised’ by the majority of American society, especially by the government. And additional hardships stand in the way of assimilation. These included the naturalization procedure, the pressure of adjusting to the new culture, and constant discrimination. On top of these factors, many refugees and migrants are dealing with trauma they experienced in their home country. For these reasons, Nhi Huynh calls for mental health resources and the establishment of open policies.

    Nhi Huynh ends the article with an ‘essential question’. “How [can] the U.S. government and we, as a community… help immigrants integrate into a new society by protecting and welcoming them?” Suggestions are provided in the remainder of the article.

    We are an individualistic society. Many of us don’t feel like an important part of our own community.

    The question of how we can help immigrants is an important but unusual question. Our immigration debates are never about what we can do. At best, they are about government policy and statistics. At worst, they are false narratives promoting fear. The question of a community’s or individual’s responsibility might bring up questions about who and what our communities are, or more importantly, what our communities look like to immigrants. We are an individualistic society. Many of us don’t feel like an important part of our own community. So it goes without saying that we don’t have traditions for how to welcome newcomers. The hospitality traditions of ancient nomadic people discussed in a previous article are a wonderful ideal, but how to they relate to us? The more we think about it, the more questions we might have. For example, don’t immigrants establish communities of their own? What do they need us for? Again, the first step would be to go to people who will tell us the truth about immigration and the needs of immigrants in our area.

    The progressive platform includes immigration reform

    You might be thinking we have plenty of community organizers and organizations that help immigrants. But the articles cited here suggest there is work that needs to be done by each of us. If the progressive platform includes immigration reform, which it does, and if the government is paying attention to our platform, it stands to reason we are going to get what we asked for. We are going to have more immigrants in our communities. Immigration has become the norm. What are we going to do about it?

    What happened to our country? Sweden has been transformed by multiculturalism – Lars Åberg

    Contribute to a new editorial project covering migration issues by La Croix International: Bakhita Stories; Read the latest stories here.